1Geophysics Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
2Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL
3NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Hunstville, AL
Between 02:04-02:12 UT (Figure 1a), the average energy fluxes in the auroral oval measured 15 minutes in local time (~ 190 km) away from the duskward and dawnward edges of the gap are 5.0 erg cm-2 s-1 and 6.7 erg cm-2 s-1, respectively. In comparison, the average energy flux at the centroid of gap is only 1.5 erg cm-2 s-2, or about 25% of that in the surrounding nightside oval. The energy flux within the gap is still, however, well above the minimum detectable energy flux of 0.2 erg cm-2 s-2, corresponding to the one count level in the UVI camera. The discontinuity is terminated by a sudden and dramatic increase in precipitation across the gap region after 02:12 UT, with a substorm onset in the 2300-2400 MLT sector filling in the gap at roughly 02:15 UT. As a result, the energy flux in the region where the gap had been rises by an order of magnitude to values between 10.0-17.0 erg cm-2 s-2.
In order to match the IMF observations at the Wind spacecraft location with the features in the UVI images, we estimate a propogation correction of 30 minutes based on a solar wind velocity of roughly 330 km s-1 (Figure 2). Over the course of the event, IMF Bz is increasing northward from roughly -5 nT to -1 nT, with the substorm onset in the gap region between 02:15-02:18 UT (Figure 1a) occuring close to the time when Bz reaches its least negative value. The By component shows a negative turning from 2.5 nT to roughly -5 nT near 01:35 UT at the Wind location, or 02:05 UT at the magnetopause, approximately the time of the gap appearance. Solar wind dynamic pressure is steady at levels near 3 nPa during this event (Figure2).
As with the previous example, we find sharp gradients in energy flux across the boundaries of the nightside gap. The energy flux at the gap centroid averaged between 01:16 UT and 01:32 UT is 1.6 erg cm-2 s-2, with energy fluxes 15 minutes in MLT (~ 190 km) away from the gap exceeding 7.0 erg cm-2 s-2. Latitudinal variations in energy flux within the gap region are also seen during this event as shown between 01:16 UT and 01:32 UT. Energy flux near the equatorward region of the gap is measured between 2.0-2.6 erg cm-2 s-2, while poleward, it is lower by a factor of two.
The IMF components at the Wind spacecraft position during the January 23 event are shown in Figure 3. A propagation correction of 48 minutes is estimated from a solar wind velocity of approximately 360 km s-1 during this time frame. The IMF Bz component had been pointing southward for approximately 1.5 hours, beginning at 23:00 UT (approximately 23:48 UT at the magnetopause), prior to the appearance of the gap near 01:12 UT. Near 00:45 UT at the Wind spacecraft, the IMF By exhibits a negative turning and the Bz component increases northward from roughly -3 nT To -1 nT. This feature was also seen in the January 18 event (Figure 2) and is consistent with the observations of Lui et al. [1995]. A sector crossing of the IMF $B_{x$ and By components is observed near 01:00 UT at the Wind spacecraft, with both Bx and By turning positive and Bz becoming decreasingly southward from -4 nT to approximately 0 nT. The solar wind dynamic pressure during this period is relatively low and steady at approximately 2 nPa (Figure 3).
We have considered whether the nightside gap is an artifact of the higher energy part of the electron distribution producing emissions in the gap region that we do not observe, but the characteristics of the LBHl filter lead us to conclude that it is a real feature and not an instrumental effect. Because the LBHl filter was designed to pass only those emissions that have no significant losses from O2 absorption [Torr et al., 1995], the LBHl images register all auroral emissions in that passband regardless of the energy of the incident electrons. The intensity of FUV auroral emissions in the LBHs passband, however, decreases for increasing electron energy, due to O2 absorption in the lower thermosphere [Germany et al., 1990]. Since the LBH auroral emissions that the UVI observes are due to electron precipitation only, the possibility of other auroral activity within the gap region, due to proton precipitation for example, cannot be discounted. The nightside gap may be spanned by narrow, discrete auroral arcs that we do not resolve due to the spatial resolution of the images near apogee and/or the wobble effect described above. Whatever structure there may be within the gap region, however, is insubstantial relative to the amount of activity just outside the discontinuity.
Kamide and Rostoker [1977] showed that discrete auroral structures are associated with upward field-aligned currents. Assuming that there are few discrete structures in the nightside gap, a likely cause of the drastic decrease in electron precipitation in the discontinuity is a significant reduction of field-aligned currents in that region. This also implies an insufficient ionospheric potential in the gap region to accelerate electrons that give rise to upward field-aligned currents. This reduction in field-aligned currents must be abrupt across local times, and must occur with a characteristic time on the order of tens of minutes, the typical duration of a gap event. Kunkel et al. [1986] have shown observations that field-aligned currents can be reduced at or near the Harang discontinuity, the separation between positive and negative disturbances in the horizontal magnetic field component [Harang, 1946] which typically occurs in the same local time sector as the nightside gap (2200-2400 MLT). Kamide [1978] has even considered the extreme case of having no upward field-aligned currents in that region.
The observations of auroral breakups within the nightside gap region conform with some magnetosphere, ionosphere coupling models [Kan, 1993] which suggest substorm expansion to be associated with an instability in the current systems near the Harang discontinuity. Koskinen and Pulkkinen [1995] have considered a scenario in which there is no flow of ionospheric plasma across the Harang discontinuity, with Pedersen currents closing through intense, upward field-aligned currents in that region. Our observations would require that these field-aligned currents grow rapidly on time scales of a few minutes, in order to explain the rapid development of substorm onsets within the gap region. The development of a plasma instability associated with this rapid growth of upward field-aligned currents within the gap region may provide a trigger mechanism for the substorms observed to initiate within the discontinuity as shown for January 18, 1997.
Dandekar, B. S. and C. P. Pike, The midday, discrete auroral gap, J. Geophys. Res., 83 , 4227, 1978.
Elphinstone, R. D. et al., Observations in the vicinity of substorm onset: implications for the substorm process, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 7937, 1995.
Germany, G. A., M. R. Torr, P. G. Richards, and D. G. Torr, The dependence of modeled OI 1356 and N2 Lyman Birge Hopfield auroral emissions on the neutral atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 7725, 1990.
Harang, L., The mean field of disturbance of polar geomagnetic storms, Terr. Mag. Atmos. Electr. , 51, 353, 1946.
Kamide, Y., and G. Rostoker, The spatial relationship of field-aligned currents and auroral electrojets to the distribution of nightside auroras, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 5589, 1977.
Kamide, Y., On current continuity at the Harang discontinuity, Planet. Spa. Sci., 26, 237, 1978.
Kan, J. R., A global magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling model of substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 17263, 1993. Koskinen, H. E. and T. I. Pulkkinen, Midnight velocity shear zone and the concept of Harang discontinuity, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 9539, 1995.
Kunkel, T., W. Baumjohann, J. Untiedt, and R. A. Greenwald, Electric field and currents at the Harang discontinuity, J. Geophys., 59, 73, 1986.
Lepping, R. P., et al., The Wind magnetic field investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 207, 1995.
Lui, A. T. Y., et al., Special features of a substorm during high solar wind dynamic pressure, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19095, 1995.
Ogilvie, K. W., et al., SWE, a comprehensive plasma instrument for the Wind spacecraft, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 55, 1995.
Richmond, A. D., Ionospheric electrodynamics using magnetic apex coordinates, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 47, 191, 1995
Torr, M., et al., A far ultraviolet imager for the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics mission, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 329, 1995.